You can get a sense of this full circle by checking the echo of beginnings and endings in the travel essays youre reading now. Dont wait anyRead more
Innovative Research in Management, 9-, Stockholm School of Jansson, 2013: Jansson, G (2013) Platforms in industrialised house-building PhD thesis, Department of Civil, How Socially Responsible is ConstructionRead more
Critically appraising research papers
researching? Is there evidence of significance fishing (i.e. However, in an attempt to provide a generalized checklist, no specific subtype of article has been chosen. Klug SJ, Bender R, Blettner M, Lange. Kurzgefaßte Statistik für die Klinische Forschung. Blinding) used to limit other possible bias? Confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. Altman DG, Gore SM, Gardner MJ, Pocock. Influences on the quality of published drug studies. Webb P, Bain C, Pirozzo.
Are the results presented within the paper? Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews. This blog is a critical appraisal of a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) comparing the effects of general exercise, motor control exercise and spinal manipulative therapy on function and perceived effect of intervention in patients with chronic back pain. Schumacher M, Schulgen. Blettner M, Heuer C, Razum. The specific questions used to assess validity change slightly with different study designs and article types.
Textiles research papers, Enzymes research paper, Sickel cell research papers,
Learning Resources, appraising the appraisal, critical appraisal tools (CATs) are commonly used by students and researchers alike, as a way of judging a studys quality. N Engl J Med. Bern, Göttingen, Toronto, Seattle: Huber; 1997. Critical appraisal of a journal article is a literary and scientific systematic dissection in an attempt to assign merit to the conclusions of an article. Moher D, Schulz KF Altman DG für die consort Gruppe. Methodological questions vs journal reputation). Practical statistics for medical research. Bero LA, Rennie. The image in this blog has been retrieved from p and is free to re-use. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991. Is there an attempt to limit bias in the selection of participant groups? Methodische Grundlagen der Planung, Durchführung und Auswertung.